首页> 外文OA文献 >Estimating Negative Likelihood Ratio Confidence When Test Sensitivity is 100%: A Bootstrapping Approach
【2h】

Estimating Negative Likelihood Ratio Confidence When Test Sensitivity is 100%: A Bootstrapping Approach

机译:当测试灵敏度为100%时估计负似然比置信度:一种自举方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: Assessing high-sensitivity tests for mortal illness is crucial in emergency and critical care medicine. Estimating the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the likelihood ratio (LR) can be challenging when sample sensitivity is 100%. We aimed to develop, compare, and automate a bootstrapping method to estimate the negative LR CI when sample sensitivity is 100%.Methods: The lowest population sensitivity that is most likely to yield sample sensitivity 100% is located using the binomial distribution. Random binomial samples generated using this population sensitivity are then used in the LR bootstrap. A free R program, “bootLR,” automates the process. Extensive simulations were performed to determine how often the LR bootstrap and comparator method 95% CIs cover the true population negative LR value. Finally, the 95% CI was compared for theoretical sample sizes and sensitivities approaching and including 100% using: (1) a technique of individual extremes, (2) SAS software based on the technique of Gart and Nam, (3) the Score CI (as implemented in the StatXact, SAS, and R PropCI package), and (4) the bootstrapping technique.Results: The bootstrapping approach demonstrates appropriate coverage of the nominal 95% CI over a spectrum of populations and sample sizes. Considering a study of sample size 200 with 100 patients with disease, and specificity 60%, the lowest population sensitivity with median sample sensitivity 100% is 99.31%. When all 100 patients with disease test positive, the negative LR 95% CIs are: individual extremes technique (0,0.073), StatXact (0,0.064), SAS Score method (0,0.057), R PropCI (0,0.062), and bootstrap (0,0.048). Similar trends were observed for other sample sizes.Conclusions: When study samples demonstrate 100% sensitivity, available methods may yield inappropriately wide negative LR CIs. An alternative bootstrapping approach and accompanying free open-source R package were developed to yield realistic estimates easily. This methodology and implementation are applicable to other binomial proportions with homogeneous responses.
机译:目标:评估对致命疾病的高灵敏度测试对于急诊和重症监护药物至关重要。当样本灵敏度为100%时,估计似然比(LR)的95%置信区间(CI)可能会很困难。我们旨在开发,比较和自动化当样品灵敏度为100%时估计负LR CI的自举方法。方法:使用二项分布确定最可能产生样品灵敏度为100%的最低总体灵敏度。然后,使用这种总体敏感性生成的随机二项式样本将用于LR引导程序。一个免费的R程序“ bootLR”使该过程自动化。进行了广泛的仿真,以确定LR引导程序和比较器方法95%CI覆盖真实总体负LR值的频率。最后,使用以下方法对95%CI进行了比较,得出的理论样本大小和敏感度接近并包括100%:( 1)个别极端情况的技术,(2)基于Gart和Nam技术的SAS软件,(3)Score CI (在StatXact,SAS和R PropCI软件包中实现),以及(4)自举技术。结果:自举方法展示了在总体种群和样本量范围内对标称95%CI的适当覆盖。考虑对200名疾病患者和200%的患者进行样本量200的研究,样本中位数敏感性为100%的最低人群敏感性为99.31%。当所有100名疾病患者的测试结果均为阳性时,LR 95%CI阴性:个人极限技术(0,0.073),StatXact(0,0.064),SAS评分方法(0,0.057),R PropCI(0,0.062),和自举(0,0.048)。结论:当研究样本显示出100%的敏感性时,可用的方法可能会产生不合适的宽负LR CI。开发了一种替代的引导方法和随附的免费开源R软件包,可以轻松地得出实际的估计。该方法和实施方法适用于具有均一响应的其他二项式比例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号